Mayor
Rocky Anderson
City and County Building
451 So. State Street
Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
April 6, 2003
Dear Mayor Anderson:
I write this letter as a
concerned citizen, a retired deputy sheriff, as an author, and as a
specialist in Mormon polygamy investigations. I hope it will be of value
to the five member commission you have appointed to scrutinize the
police investigation of Elizabeth Smart. I believe your
"commission" has the potential of favorably influencing future
investigations involving miscreants imbedded in the Mormon
fundamentalist subculture.
It has been the
half-hearted handling of Utah polygamists that enabled Brian Mitchell to
commit a heinous crime, almost unnoticed, when he should have been a
serious suspect from the beginning.
The Elizabeth Smart kidnapping
and arrest of Mormon fundamentalist, Brian David Mitchell, has created
some interesting conundrums that cry out for explanation. Why? Because
for years the polygamy subculture has been a disgusting breeding grounds
and refuge for murderers, thieves, kidnapers and sexual predators, all
masquerading as religions icons.
First of all, according
to the Salt Lake Tribune, Mayor Rocky Anderson sent a memo to SLC
Police Chief Rick Dines "less than two weeks" after the
abduction, "imploring" the Chief to "aggressively"
pursue "leads that pointed to a homeless street preacher named
‘Immanuel’ as the potential kidnapper." Evidently, the memo was
not taken as seriously as it should have. Once the word
"preacher" came into play, light bulbs should have flashed on.
Furthermore, did the Salt
Lake City Police share this important memo with the FBI? If they did,
how was the memo treated?
Secondly, Discordant
overtones are fanning the air. How much did personality, rivalry,
jealousy and arrogance impair what should have been an objective,
coordinated investigation? The Smart family and people of Utah are
entitled to know what happened, because it is well rumored in police
circles that Mayor Rocky Anderson is unfriendly to law enforcement; and,
I know from twenty-three years in law enforcement that arrogance on the
part of some investigators can hamper an investigation.
Thirdly, why wasn’t
polygamy specialist, Lt. Ron Barton, of the Utah State Attorney
General’s Office consulted? Here is a valuable resource that went
untapped. The Utah State Legislature created the position occupied by
Lt. Barton nearly three years ago for this very purpose. Lt. Barton is
knowledgeable, has numerous valuable contacts in the Mormon
fundamentalist subculture, and he is responsible.
On April 4, 2003, the Tribune
printed a story entitled, "Chief on Smart Case: ‘Good
Investigation.’" The story by journalists Kevin Cantera and
Michael Vigh, appeared to be a vindication of the police failure to
solve the case. The story quoted from an impressive parade of FBI and
police experts that suggested the Salt Lake City Police should be
absolved of any dereliction in the investigation. Were these experts
told that an "itinerant preacher," who once worked for the
Smart family as a handyman, was a suspect within two weeks after the
abduction?
In reading the Tribune’s
article, I am convinced that the police did an outstanding job in
investigating Richard Ricci. I have to admit that in following the case
in the newspapers, I too thought Ricci was the most likely suspect. But
the true crux of the investigation is in the answer to the following
question: How much did the SLC Police know about Brian David Mitchell
the day Elizabeth Smart was rescued? Because – the
fact of the matter is that the kidnapping was solved by four alert
citizens, not the police - four crucial citizens who in the developing
stories seem to have fallen by the wayside.
My concerns are
shared by others and are not unfair hindsight. Had Lt. Barton been
contacted when Mitchell first became a suspect, a coordinated effort
between the SL City Police and Attorney General’s Office might very
well have resulted in a much sooner solution.
There seems to be a
tendency by law enforcement and prosecutors to downplay the polygamy
factor, when in reality, the Mormon fundamentalist subculture, that
spawned Brian Mitchell, were it possible, should also be indicted. Are
we afraid that if we acknowledge that there are serious cultural
problems in the Mormon fundamentalist subculture that we will indirectly
offend prominent, influential individuals or institutions?
The Utah Legislature has
passed laws against bigamous, child marriages. If
these laws are not
aggressively acted upon by law enforcement then they are nothing more
than window dressing.
In the heartland of
polygamy - which is Colorado City, Arizona - young girls designated as
plural wives disappear with regularity. Flora Jessop was held captive in
a bedroom for months. Fourteen year old Ruby Jessop disappeared nearly
two years ago. The physical and mental enslavement of little girls in
Colorado City is every much as real as it was with Elizabeth Smart.
The most sensational news
stories to come out of Utah in the last twenty years has involved Mormon
polygamists. [Ervil LeBaron, John Singer, Adam Swapp, Dan and Ron
Lafferty, Paul Kingston, Warren Jeffs, Tom Green, Jim Harmston, Owen
Allred and now Brian Mitchell] This is because the Mormon fundamentalist
subculture has in place all the twisted doctrines that can further
distort an already deranged mind.
The most pernicious
Mormon doctrine is plural marriage, a commandment that requires men and
women to take multiple wives in order to "raise up a righteous
seed" and receive a "celestial exaltation." The polygamy
doctrine, coupled with an unconscionable sex urge, can be a dangerous
combination, like drinking and driving.
The second most
pernicious doctrine is "unaccountability." Mormon
fundamentalists recognize only God’s laws, which supersedes man’s
laws. All of the actions of Mormon fundamentalists, including Brian
David Mitchell, are ostensibly sanctioned by God - acts considered by
society as murder, rape, theft, deception and kidnapping.
A week after the kidnapping
I was contacted by a journalist asking if the abduction might have been
motivated by polygamy. I learned that other experts on polygamy had been
asked the same question. At the time there was nothing reported in the
newspapers to suspect a polygamy connection. I thought the Smart family
had enough troubles without inserting something as provocative as
polygamy on mere speculation. But was it speculation?
The April 5th Tribune
article suggested that the reason the police did not go public with
Mitchell’s "composite sketch" sooner is that Mitchell might
have gone underground, but that should not have kept police from looking
for him and checking him out. It was obvious to everyone that Elizabeth
was not a random victim.
Lets face it, no one
thought that religion could have been the motive. It was to far removed
from the stereotypical kidnapping - sex, murder, ransom or revenge. But
where did Mayor Rocky Anderson get his information about Mitchell? Was
it from a source other than Elizabeth’s little sister?
Cory Lyman, who lead the
investigation, told the Tribune that "police were
aggressively following every lead." With that said, then it is only
fair to ask who was assigned to follow up on Mayor Anderson’s memo,
when, and what did he find?
My criticism of the
Elizabeth Smart investigation is not so much to make the SLC Police
Department look bad, but to emphasis the fact that there exists a
dangerous criminal element within the Mormon fundamentalist subculture
that is being overlooked and underestimated. I believe that the Salt
Lake County Sheriff’s Office, from where I retired, and other police
departments, in all probability, would have made the same mistakes. The
intelligence just wasn’t there to make the connection. Nevertheless,
if we don’t call attention to the mistakes, and even rub it in a
little, when it comes to Utah’s religious fanatics, there will be more
mistakes in the future. Nor should we, at the expense of future victims,
downplay or ignore the degenerate aspects of Mormon fundamentalism
because it might adversely reflect upon, and cause discomfort to,
Utah’s dominate religion.
The last twenty years
should be clear and convincing evidence that the question is not what
heinous crime might happen next in the polygamist subculture, but when
will it happen. As soon as the prosecution of Mitchell is history and
things return to normal, some other fanatic will get a revelation and
Utah will be back in the headlines.
I wonder, how many more
times will Utah take it on the chin before church and government wake up
to the fact that there are serious problems in the Mormon fundamentalist
subculture.
Please be advised that
this letter will be posted on the following websites: and
Sincerely,
John R. Llewellyn
P. O. Box
Riverton, Utah 84065
E-mail: john@polygamybooks.net
CC:Chief
Rick Dinse
Salt Lake City Police Department
315 E. 200 So.
Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
Kirk Torgensen, Chief
Deputy
Utah State Attorney General’s Office
236 State Capital
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-0810